Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA23016 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:33:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQaaeq22117; Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:10:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA27812; Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:11:02 -0500
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:11:02 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <3108DED5.167E@megatoon.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Christian Aubert <chris@megatoon.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Lightwave convenience feature...
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Brenden Mecleary wrote:
>
> one object/attribute to another. I say this because I deal with a lot
> of symmetrical objects in some of my models, and although I can clone
> them, I sometimes make changes after the clone that I don't want to
> have to input manually. Or for example, I would oftentimes like to
> have a lens flare fade with the intensity of a light. I think it would
> be great if I could just create one envelope and then copy it into the
> other one! I don't think this would be too hard to code in (it seems
> downright easy, in fact), so maybe it could end up in Rev. D?
One way of doing this that would be really cool is through expressions
like Alias doest it. You can define a motion channel for an object as a